« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 24, 2005

Fighting Terrorism

In a recent letter to the editor, I stressed the need to fight terrorism without sacrificing truth or liberty in the process. But, I did not directly address the question of how we should fight terrorism.

Clearly, we must maintain military, economic, and diplomatic pressure on known terrorists, terrorist groups, and countries known to support those who would use terror tactics against us. We must capture, kill, or bring to justice those who practice violence against us. However, military means alone will never be sufficient to rid us of this danger.

We just emerged from a Cold War against communism. We did not win that war on the battlefield. We won it by our example - by our liberties, our democracy, and the innovation and efficiency of our market economy. We won the Cold War by sticking to the values upon which we have built this nation, and which have earned us the respect of the world.

Like communism, our terrorist enemies appeal to the desperation and hopelessness of a large part of the earth’s population. They point to our wealth and power, and blame our country for the injustice and suffering of so many. We must approach this battle intelligently. While Al Qaeda has only a handful of members, the danger lies in the resonance of their message with billions of desperate, angry people. Just as with communism, we have to fight this battle in a way that separates our enemies from the people they are appealing to. We must show that we care about these people’s plight. And we must not fight the battle in a way that seems to confirm what the terrorists say about us.

I am guided by three principles in the fight against terrorism.

Don’t fight terrorism alone. Don’t make enemies we don’t have to. Don’t bully and threaten our friends: no more unilateralism. All nations have an interest in stopping terrorist violence and black mail. Work to make this every nation’s battle. They supported us after 9/11 and they will do so again because all civilized countries can be the target of terrorists.

Don’t confuse the terrorists with the people they appeal to. While we will make no concessions to the terrorists, we must sympathize with the dire economic plight and the lack of basic rights suffered by billions of our fellow human beings. We must support policies that address these issues. Creating hope and stability is the only way we will permanently remove the scourge of terrorism.

We must not abandon the values that have served this nation so well. Stooping to the moral level of the terrorists is a terrible mistake. Secret prisons, torture, and circumvention of the law undermine our moral authority, isolate us from our closest friends, and give credence to the claims of our enemies.

We must fight terrorism by relying on our strengths. Yes we must strike some blows. But we will win this war by being true to the values that have made us the most compassionate, prosperous and freest nation in the world. America will win this battle by relying on our fundamental founding principles.

- Jerry McNerney

December 23, 2005

Pombo: "Most Anti-Conservation" in Congress

Pombo Deemed "Most Anti-Conservation" Member of Congress

Unfortunately, say environmentalists, Rep. Pombo's busy-ness has all been aimed, once again, at undermining or actually eviscerating long-established laws that protect America's natural resources. As Defenders of Wildlife President Rodger Schlickeisen put it last month in an interview with the Oakland Tribune, Rep. Pombo is "the most anti-conservation congressman of the 535 in Congress."

Link: Bush Greenwatch.

(Hat tip: San No to Pombo)

December 08, 2005

Responsible Government Needed

Parents have a responsibility to convince their children to do many things that are not fun or give immediate gratification, but are necessary for the children's long term benefit such as eating vegetables, studying, or saving money. Governments have a similar responsibility to convince their citizens to do things that are not necessarily popular, and the success of the government is sometimes a result of how good they are at doing this. Weak governments can easily dodge this responsibility and are lured into doing what is popular, leading to trouble. One example is paying taxes. It takes a fortune to run a great country, but taxes are unpopular, and it is easy to get elected by promising to lower taxes. The political consequence is normally that government services are reduced. Another popular thing to do is to rattle sabers in the international sphere. It makes people feel that their country is mighty, and this reflects on the citizens, who might say something like: "Yea, we can kick their butts." But the consequence of war is often incredibly painful as people get killed, governments collapse, and countries are overrun. Another example would be to neglect to prepare for shortages of some critical resource, such as food, water, or in the modern world, energy.

No government can fully live up to all of its responsibility, but the underlying strength of the society will usually manage to overcome the shortfalls. It's rare to find a government that is entirely negligent in asking its citizens to contribute to the common good and to prepare for the future, but the current Administration and Congress, led by the far right of the Republican Party has been shockingly irresponsible in carrying out any preparation for the future.

These lapses would ordinarily cause a political penalty, but for this Administration, a fortuitous collection of factors have sheltered it from the consequences of gross pandering. For example consider the Administration's determination to lower taxes. Normally, this would result in a reduction of government services. But today, countries such as China and Saudi Arabia are awash in American dollars and are willing to finance federal budget deficits at low interest. Therefore, painful cuts that should accompany tax cuts are not necessary. The Administration is able to defer the pain for a later government while taking the benefit now. Unfortunately, this pain is likely to come when the economy is faltering for some other reason, such as energy shortages. This is highly irresponsible.

Take another example, starting a war without provocation. The Administration started a war with insufficient justification and without a plan for winning the peace. They went against the judgment of the international community, and alienated our allies by telling them 'you are either with us or against us.' They removed a toothless dictator but did not plan or prepare to build an entirely new Iraqi nation. Now, the political consequences are being felt. Fortunately, our armed forces are so vastly superior that there isn't much danger of them suffering a military defeat. But our young men and women have been placed in an impossible situation where their very presence engenders the kind of national resentment that fuels the insurgency and feeds into international terrorism. Even this week, President Bush again stooped to evoking a fabricated link between the tragic attacks of 9/11 and Iraq to rally support for his war. This is irresponsible and deceitful.

Another example of this Administration's irresponsibility is allowing and even encouraging us to become more and more dependent upon oil. Our society depends on cheap oil. Our economy will utterly collapse without it, and yet, there is significant evidence that the era of cheap oil will end soon. Worldwide oil production appears to be at the peak just when oil consumption is increasing at an exponential rate worldwide. It will take time, a decade or more, for our infrastructure to become efficient and to adapt to alternative energy sources, and yet, indications are that cheap oil could end quickly and suddenly. Yet, no preparations are made despite the fact that the United States has the technology and resources to replace oil. This is incredibly irresponsible.

This Administration and the Republican right have used fear and greed, appealing to our basest instincts in order to gain power, and yet has no plan for our nation's long term well being. They are putting our nation at great risk for short term political gain. They have been successful so far in avoiding the consequences for their irresponsible behavior. This luck will not last forever. It's time for true conservatives to stand up with moderates and progressives for the sake of our country. Politicians need to start leveling with the American people. Some sacrifice is necessary for this country to build a prosperous and secure future. The benefit of a collective decision to carry out the changes needed would be immense. We will transform society to assure a clean, productive, healthy, and secure future and inspire the rest of the world to follow suit. The consequences of ignoring these problems will also be immense and possibly catastrophic. It's our responsibility to lay out the current situation, the risks and the alternatives and let the American people decide. The truth matters.

- Jerry McNerney